India signs international tax agreement

by admin on January 28, 2012

India has signed the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, a multilateral agreement which promotes international co-operation while respecting the rights of taxpayers.
Go to Source

{ 0 comments }

By Daniel J. Mitchell

One year ago, I wrote about how the French government was getting unexpected additional revenues following the implementation of lower tax rates.

This is the Laffer Curve in action, and it’s happening again in France, only this time because the government reduced the wealth tax.

Here’s part of the story at Tax-news.com.

France’s solidarity tax on wealth (l’impôt de solidarité sur la fortune – ISF), which was radically reformed by the government in June last year, has served to yield much greater fiscal revenues for the state than initially predicted.

…[T]he government agreed that the solidarity tax on wealth would in future comprise of only two tax brackets: a 0.25% tax rate imposed on individuals with net taxable wealth in excess of EUR1.3m (USD1.7m), and a 0.5% tax rate levied on individuals with net taxable assets above EUR3m. Previously, the entry threshold at which wealth tax was applied was EUR800,000, with the rates varying between 0.55% and 1.8%. To alleviate any threshold effects, a discount mechanism was also instated applicable to wealth of between EUR1.3m and EUR1.4m, as well as to wealth of between EUR3m and EUR3.2m. Although the new provisions provide for lower tax rates and for the abolition of the first tax bracket, effectively exempting around 300,000 taxpayers from the tax, according to latest government figures, the tax yielded around EUR4.3bn in 2011, almost EUR60m more than originally forecast in the collective budget.

This is not to say that France is an example to follow. There shouldn’t be any wealth tax, and income tax rates are still far too high.

And it’s also worth remembering that tax policy is just one of many factors that determine economic performance.

That being said, nations that shift from terrible tax policy to bad tax policy will enjoy better economic performance, just as nations that go from good policy to great policy also will reap benefits.

In other words, incremental changes make a difference. That’s even the case when the politicians impose a “Snooki tax” on indoor tanning services.

The most dramatic Laffer Curve effects, though, occur when there are big changes in policy. The video after the jump looks at some of the evidence.

This video is part of a three-part series, by the way. Click here if you want to see the entire set.

The Laffer Curve Works, Even in France is a post from Cato @ Liberty – Cato Institute Blog

Go to Source

{ 0 comments }

‘Professor Cornpone: Ethanol Lobbyist Newt Gingrich—and the Future of the GOP’ (Cato @ Liberty Blog)

January 28, 2012

By Alan Reynolds The title is from a Wall Street Journal editorial in January of 2011. I commented on Gingrich’s response to that editorial in the following excerpt from a chapter I wrote for a recently published book by Robert E. Looney, ed., Handbook of Oil Politics, Routledge (2012): Even if draconian belt-tightening by U.S. [...]

Read the full article →

Biennial Budgeting: Baloney Budget Reform (Cato @ Liberty Blog)

January 28, 2012

By Tad DeHaven I don’t recall ever agreeing with the left-liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), but their new paper on the drawbacks of the federal government switching to biennial budgeting is a good read. Congressional Republicans, including House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Senate Budget Committee ranking member Jeff Sessions [...]

Read the full article →

What the Romney and Gingrich 1040s Tell Us About How We Tax The Rich

January 28, 2012

Ernest Hemingway: I am getting to know the rich. Mary Colum: I think you’ll find the only difference between the rich and other people is that the rich have more money. It turns out that when it comes to taxes, at least, Ms. Colum, was mostly—but not entirely–right. To see why, let’s take a quick [...]

Read the full article →

Intuit Releases Free Earned Income Tax Credit Mobile App: Helping Connect People to Money They Deserve

January 28, 2012

Today is National Earned Income Tax Credit Awareness Day and Intuit is helping you become more AWARE  with the release of a new mobile app to help you determine if you qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). earned income credit app According to  the IRS, an estimated 20 to 25 percent of qualified [...]

Read the full article →

Lederman Presents Measured Tax Enforcement Today at Miami

January 28, 2012

Leandra Lederman (Indiana-Bloomington) presents Measured Tax Enforcement (with Ted Sichelman (San Diego)) at Miami today as part of its Speaker Series: Governments rely largely on tax revenues. Traditional economic models of tax compliance typically assume that it is in the government’s best interest to maximize the amount of tax due… Go to Source

Read the full article →

Howard Abrams Named Dean Finalist at Emory

January 28, 2012

Tax Prof Howard Abrams has been named a Dean Finalist at Emory, along with Robert Schapiro and Frank Vandall. From The Faculty Lounge: Emory Law announced its dean search on Jaunary 12, 2012 with a call for nominations of tenured Emory faculty. Based on the timeline set out in this… Go to Source

Read the full article →

When Higher Marginal Tax Rates Helped the Economy

January 28, 2012

Nicholas Paleveda (CEO, National Pension Partners; Adjunct Professor, Northeastern Graduate Tax Program), Professor Paleveda’s Paradox: When Higher Marginal Tax Rates Helped the Economy: This paper reviews the time where higher marginal tax rates actually helped the economy. In some cases lowering the marginal tax rate, the economy did not improve…. Go to Source

Read the full article →

Walker: A Tax Response to the Executive Pay Problem

January 28, 2012

David I. Walker (Boston University), A Tax Response to the Executive Pay Problem: Many observers believe that that the public company executive labor market is deficient and results in systematically excessive compensation. This Article accepts that premise and considers potential regulatory responses. Specifically, this Article proposes and analyzes a two-pronged… Go to Source

Read the full article →